Stop the War on Innocence: Police Militarization Shreds Due Process

Across America, most arrests occur at private residences, often involving individuals with stable homes, no violent history, and no serious risk of flight. Yet police increasingly launch these arrests with military-style SWAT teams, no-knock raids, and aggressive force, treating suspects as enemies of the state rather than citizens presumed innocent under the law.

FBI data reveal that only about 5% of arrests involve violent crimes. The vast majority of arrests target nonviolent offenses like drug possession, DUI, or petty theft. In Columbus, Cleveland, and Dayton, most arrests are for nonviolent offenses—about 88% in Columbus, over 50% low-level in Dayton, and a large share in Cleveland tied to property crimes—highlighting how policing focuses mainly on nonviolent acts. Most suspects live at known addresses, hold jobs, and pose no active threat to the public. Arrests for nonviolent charges could be handled calmly, through peaceful surrender or negotiated apprehension. Instead, law enforcement chooses violence.

The modern use of SWAT teams exposes the militarized mindset rotting American policing. Originally designed for hostage crises and active shooters, SWAT raids now serve routine search warrants and low-level drug busts. The ACLU found that 80% of SWAT deployments involved searches, not emergencies. Each year, police conduct roughly 50,000 SWAT raids—many smashing into homes where no violence or resistance awaited them.

No-knock raids, a grotesque extension of this aggression, strip civilians of the chance to even answer the door. These unannounced invasions often create the very violence police claim to prevent. Startled homeowners, mistaking police for intruders, have defended themselves with tragic results. Innocent people die, children suffer trauma, and families are ripped apart—often for nothing more than suspected personal drug use. In most fatal no-knock raids, police recovered minimal or no contraband.

Such tactics directly assault the principles of due process and the presumption of innocence. In the American tradition, every citizen deserves to be treated as innocent until proven guilty. Yet militarized raids treat suspects as battlefield combatants to be neutralized. Officers blast into homes with flashbang grenades, battering rams, and automatic weapons, as if civilians were enemy soldiers.

This aggressive approach not only violates constitutional protections; it invites unnecessary bloodshed. SWAT raids have killed dozens of civilians, including bystanders and family members not even suspected of wrongdoing. Police forces, emboldened by federal militarization grants and asset forfeiture incentives, too often escalate force without genuine necessity. Peaceful alternatives—summonses, voluntary surrenders, traditional arrests—are ignored in favor of dramatic shows of power.

Libertarians recognize the dangerous consequences of empowering the state with unchecked force. Policing must have a legitimate purpose: protecting the rights of individuals, not terrorizing the public. The deployment of military tactics against peaceful citizens betrays every principle of limited government and individual liberty.

Ending this abuse requires immediate action. No-knock raids must be strictly limited or abolished. SWAT deployments should be reserved for true emergencies, not routine warrant service. Judges must stop rubber-stamping no-knock warrants based on vague threats. Police departments must retrain officers to de-escalate, not provoke, and to respect the rights of the accused.

The Constitution demands more. Every raid that treats an innocent citizen as an enemy combatant erodes the fragile line between free society and tyranny. If liberty means anything, it must mean the right to live free from arbitrary violence at the hands of government agents. Americans must insist that law enforcement serves the people, not wages war against them.

Amendment Proposal: Elimination of Townships and Reallocation of Their Powers and Responsibilities

Section 1: Purpose

The purpose of this amendment is to streamline local governance in the State of Ohio by eliminating the township form of government and redistributing its powers, responsibilities, and resources to counties and municipalities. This change aims to reduce redundancy, enhance governmental efficiency, and improve service delivery to Ohio residents.


Section 2: Elimination of Townships

(A) Effective [insert date], the township form of government is hereby abolished in the State of Ohio.

(B) All legal, administrative, and fiscal functions currently exercised by township governments shall be reassigned to counties and municipalities in accordance with this amendment.


Section 3: Redistribution of Powers and Responsibilities

(A) County governments shall assume responsibility for:
(1) Road maintenance and infrastructure formerly under township control.
(2) Zoning and land-use planning not currently managed by municipalities.
(3) Cemetery operations and maintenance.
(4) Any additional services or responsibilities as determined by the General Assembly.

(B) Municipalities shall assume jurisdiction over local services within their existing boundaries, including:
(1) Law enforcement and fire protection where previously provided by townships.
(2) Local parks and recreation services.

(C) The General Assembly shall establish a transitional commission to oversee the reassignment of responsibilities, ensuring continuity of services for all Ohio residents.


Section 4: Transfer of Assets and Liabilities

(A) All township assets, including but not limited to real property, equipment, financial accounts, and records, shall be transferred to the respective county or municipality based on the location of the asset or the nature of its use.

(B) All township liabilities, including but not limited to outstanding debts and contractual obligations, shall be assumed by counties or municipalities in proportion to their jurisdictional authority or benefit.

(C) The General Assembly shall enact laws to facilitate the equitable redistribution of township resources.


Section 5: Transitional Governance

(A) A temporary commission, known as the Ohio Township Transition Commission, shall be established within 90 days of this amendment’s ratification.
(1) The Commission shall include representatives from counties, municipalities, and state government.
(2) The Commission shall develop and publish a comprehensive transition plan within one year of its formation.

(B) Township officials holding office on the effective date of this amendment shall serve as advisors to the Transition Commission until their terms expire.


Section 6: Amendments to Existing Laws

(A) The General Assembly shall amend or repeal all state laws that conflict with the elimination of townships as required by this amendment.

(B) Counties and municipalities shall have two years from the effective date of this amendment to adopt ordinances or resolutions necessary to fulfill their new responsibilities.


Section 7: Severability Clause

If any provision of this amendment is held invalid, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.


Submission to the Electorate

This amendment shall be submitted to the electors of the State of Ohio at the next general election occurring at least 90 days after its ratification by the General Assembly.


This is a draft proposal for discussion purposes only and not endorsed by FCLPO.